Daniel Cukierman vs Roy Smith, Plaisir 2020, Quarterfinal

ITF M25 · Quarterfinal · Hard · Fri 18 Sept

Final

Daniel Cukierman

WinnerRank #1376

Cukierman won in 3 sets · 2h 48m

2–1

Set 16–7¹⁰

Set 26–4

Set 36–4

Roy Smith

LostRank #1556

Venue

Tennis Club de Plaisir

Plaisir, FRA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

118 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Low

Match stats

2h 48m

7Aces5

1Double faults2

69Service points won67

16Service games played16

14Service games won12

16Return games played16

3/560%Break points saved50%4/8

4/850%Break points converted40%2/5

Head to head

1Cukierman

0Smith

1 meeting

PlaisirQuarterfinal · 18 Sept 2020HardThis match
Daniel Cukierman
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6¹⁰Set 2: 6Set 3: 6
Roy Smith
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7¹²Set 2: 4Set 3: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Daniel Cukierman vs Roy Smith, Plaisir 2020, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research