Christian Lindell vs Emilio Nava, Weston 2020, Semifinal

ITF M25 · Semifinal · Clay · Sat 1 Feb

Final

Christian Lindell

WinnerRank #957

Lindell won in 2 sets · 45m

2–0

Set 16–2

Set 26–0

Emilio Nava

LostRank #123

Venue

Midtown Athletic Club

Weston, USA· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

23 km/h

Moderate

Humidity

90%

Very humid

Temperature

26°C

Warm

Altitude

2 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

45m

5Aces0

1Double faults3

28Service points won17

7Service games played7

7Service games won2

7Return games played7

0/0Break points saved38%3/8

5/863%Break points converted0/0

Head to head

1Lindell

0Nava

1 meeting

WestonSemifinal · 1 Feb 2020ClayThis match
Christian Lindell
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Emilio Nava
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 0

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Christian Lindell vs Emilio Nava, Weston 2020, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research