Daniel Altmaier vs Ulises Blanch, Ann Arbor Challenger 2020, Semifinal

Challenger · Semifinal · Hard · Sat 11 Jan

Final

Daniel Altmaier

LostRank #60

Blanch won in 2 sets · 1h 4m

0–2

Set 13–6

Set 24–6

Ulises Blanch

WinnerRank #1661

Venue

Varsity Tennis Center

Ann Arbor, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

277 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Low

Match stats

1h 4m

10Aces3

2Double faults1

34Service points won41

9Service games played10

7Service games won10

10Return games played9

1/333%Break points saved0/0

0/0Break points converted67%2/3

Head to head

0Altmaier

1Blanch

1 meeting

Ann Arbor ChallengerSemifinal · 11 Jan 2020HardThis match
Ulises Blanch
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Daniel Altmaier
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Daniel Altmaier vs Ulises Blanch, Ann Arbor Challenger 2020, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research