Niels Lootsma vs Simone Roncalli, Cairo 2019, Round of 16

ITF M15 · Round of 16 · Hard · Thu 5 Dec

Final

Niels Lootsma

LostRank #1996

Roncalli won in 2 sets · 1h 12m

0–2

Set 13–6

Set 20–6

Simone Roncalli

WinnerRank #1521

Venue

Al-Solaimaneyah Tennis Center

Cairo, EGY· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

19 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

67%

Moderate

Temperature

24°C

Warm

Altitude

90 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 12m

3Aces3

4Double faults0

22Service points won32

7Service games played8

3Service games won8

8Return games played7

4/850%Break points saved0/0

0/0Break points converted50%4/8

Head to head

0Lootsma

1Roncalli

1 meeting

CairoRound of 16 · 5 Dec 2019HardThis match
Simone Roncalli
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Niels Lootsma
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 0

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Niels Lootsma vs Simone Roncalli, Cairo 2019, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research