Jan Satral vs Mattia Frinzi, Monastir 2019, Semifinal

ITF M15 · Semifinal · Hard · Sat 30 Nov

Final

Jan Satral

WinnerRank #1827

Satral won in 2 sets · 1h 36m

2–0

Set 17–6²

Set 26–3

Mattia Frinzi

LostRank #1926

Venue

Magic Hotel Skanes Family Monastir

Sahline, TUN· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

14 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

77%

Humid

Temperature

19°C

Mild

Altitude

6 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 36m

7Aces4

3Double faults3

43Service points won38

11Service games played10

8Service games won6

10Return games played11

1/425%Break points saved50%4/8

4/850%Break points converted75%3/4

Head to head

1Satral

0Frinzi

1 meeting

MonastirSemifinal · 30 Nov 2019HardThis match
Jan Satral
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Mattia Frinzi
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6²Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Jan Satral vs Mattia Frinzi, Monastir 2019, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research