Jan Satral vs Oleksii Krutykh, Milovice 2019, Quarterfinal

ITF M15 · Quarterfinal · Hard · Fri 15 Nov

Final

Jan Satral

WinnerRank #1827

Satral won in 3 sets · 1h 28m

2–1

Set 16–4

Set 21–6

Set 36–0

Oleksii Krutykh

LostRank #440

Venue

Tenisový Klub Milovice

Milovice, CZE· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

199 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Low

Match stats

1h 28m

16Aces6

3Double faults2

40Service points won40

11Service games played12

9Service games won8

12Return games played11

1/333%Break points saved33%2/6

4/667%Break points converted67%2/3

Head to head

1Satral

0Krutykh

1 meeting

MiloviceQuarterfinal · 15 Nov 2019HardThis match
Jan Satral
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Set 3: 6
Oleksii Krutykh
Sets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 0

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Jan Satral vs Oleksii Krutykh, Milovice 2019, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research