Michal Konecny vs Robin Stanek, Opava 2019, Quarterfinal
Final score
Final
6-4 7-6(3)Venue and conditions
Tennis Center OpavaOpava, CZE
ClayCourt speedData unavailable
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsHistorical daily weather
Match stats
1h 33m7Aces7
3Double faults1
42Service points won53
11Service games played11
9Service games won10
11Return games played11
1/333%Break points saved83%5/6
1/617%Break points converted67%2/3
Head to head
1Konecny
3Stanek
4 meetingsClay 1–2Hard 0–1
- OpavaQuarterfinal · 1 Nov 2019ClayThis matchRobin StanekSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7Michal KonecnySets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 63
- PardubiceQualifying R2 · 25 Jun 2019ClayRobin StanekSets won: 2Set 1: 1Set 2: 6Set 3: 10Michal KonecnySets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 2Set 3: 2
- PragueQuarterfinal · 18 May 2018ClayMichal KonecnySets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Robin StanekSets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 2
- ŚlęzaQuarterfinal · 2015HardRobin StanekSets won: 2Set 1: 69Set 2: 7Set 3: 6Michal KonecnySets won: 1Set 1: 7Set 2: 66Set 3: 4
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.