Vaclav Safranek vs Niklas Schell, Liberec 2019, Round of 16

ITF M15 · Round of 16 · Carpet · Thu 24 Oct

Final · Retired

Vaclav Safranek

WinnerRank #11791.0589%

Safranek won · Retired · 54m

1–0

Set 16–2

Set 25–2

Niklas Schell

LostRank #11008.7011%

Venue

LTK Liberec

Liberec, CZE· Carpet

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

381 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Moderate

Match stats

54m

7Aces4

1Double faults0

32Service points won25

8Service games played7

8Service games won4

7Return games played8

0/0Break points saved50%3/6

3/650%Break points converted0/0

Head to head

1Safranek

0Schell

1 meeting

LiberecRound of 16 · 24 Oct 2019CarpetThis match
Vaclav Safranek
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 5
Niklas Schell
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 2
Niklas Schell · Retired

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Vaclav Safranek vs Niklas Schell, Liberec 2019, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research