Vasil Dimitrov vs Benjamin Niv, Burgas 2019, Round of 32

ITF M15 · Round of 32 · Clay · Thu 10 Oct

Final

Vasil Dimitrov

LostRank #1981

Niv won in 2 sets · 1h 5m

0–2

Set 11–6

Set 24–6

Benjamin Niv

WinnerRank #1727

Venue

Tennis Club Avenue

Burgas, BUL· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

17 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

77%

Humid

Temperature

24°C

Warm

Altitude

13 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 5m

0Aces0

7Double faults2

18Service points won32

8Service games played9

3Service games won7

9Return games played8

1/617%Break points saved33%1/3

2/367%Break points converted83%5/6

Head to head

0Dimitrov

1Niv

1 meeting

BurgasRound of 32 · 10 Oct 2019ClayThis match
Benjamin Niv
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Vasil Dimitrov
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Vasil Dimitrov vs Benjamin Niv, Burgas 2019, Round of 32

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research