Bruno Pujol Navarro vs Ignacio Vinas, Tabarka 2019, Qualifying R3

ITF M15 · Qualifying R3 · Hard · Tue 8 Oct

Final

Bruno Pujol Navarro

LostRank #1532

Vinas won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 13–6

Set 26–7⁶

Ignacio Vinas

WinnerUnranked

Venue

Magic Hotel Thabraca

Tabarka, TUN· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

24 km/h

Moderate

Humidity

76%

Humid

Temperature

24°C

Warm

Altitude

14 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Head to head

0Navarro

1Vinas

1 meeting

TabarkaQualifying R3 · 8 Oct 2019HardThis match
Ignacio Vinas
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7⁸
Bruno Pujol Navarro
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 6⁶

Form and path

Bruno Pujol Navarro

No recent matches recorded.

Ignacio Vinas

TabarkaThis week

WQualifying R2
Ignacio Vinas
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
Nikolas Lahky
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 5

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Bruno Pujol Navarro vs Ignacio Vinas, Tabarka 2019, Qualifying R3

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research