Mate Voros vs Lukas Jirousek, Antalya 2019, Qualifying R2

ITF M15 · Qualifying R2 · Clay · Mon 7 Oct

Final

Mate Voros

WinnerRank #2002

Voros won in 2 sets

2–0

Set 16–0

Set 26–0

Lukas Jirousek

LostUnranked

Venue

Hotel Kaya Belek

Belek, TUR· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

16 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

69%

Moderate

Temperature

26°C

Warm

Altitude

8 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Head to head

1Voros

0Jirousek

1 meeting

AntalyaQualifying R2 · 7 Oct 2019ClayThis match
Mate Voros
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Lukas Jirousek
Sets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 0

Form and path

Mate Voros

No recent matches recorded.

Lukas Jirousek1–1

AntalyaThis week

WQualifying R1
Lukas Jirousek
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Gleb Smolyakov
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 2

AntalyaClay

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Mate Voros vs Lukas Jirousek, Antalya 2019, Qualifying R2

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research