Anas Fattar vs Moez Echargui, Tabarka 2019, Semifinal

ITF M15 · Semifinal · Hard · Sat 14 Sept

Final

Anas Fattar

LostRank #1612

Echargui won in 2 sets · 1h 31m

0–2

Set 11–6

Set 24–6

Moez Echargui

WinnerRank #348

Venue

Magic Hotel Thabraca

Tabarka, TUN· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

12 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

72%

Humid

Temperature

33°C

Hot

Altitude

14 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 31m

0Aces1

8Double faults1

26Service points won37

8Service games played9

4Service games won8

9Return games played8

4/850%Break points saved50%1/2

1/250%Break points converted50%4/8

Head to head

0Fattar

1Echargui

1 meeting

TabarkaSemifinal · 14 Sept 2019HardThis match
Moez Echargui
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Anas Fattar
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Anas Fattar vs Moez Echargui, Tabarka 2019, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research