Adam Walton vs Neel Rajesh, Champaign 2019, Qualifying R2

ITF M15 · Qualifying R2 · Hard · Mon 9 Sept

Final

Adam Walton

WinnerRank #98

Walton won in 2 sets

2–0

Set 16–2

Set 26–1

Neel Rajesh

LostRank #1672

Venue

Atkins Tennis Center

Urbana, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

17 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

76%

Humid

Temperature

30°C

Warm

Altitude

231 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Head to head

1Walton

0Rajesh

1 meeting

ChampaignQualifying R2 · 9 Sept 2019HardThis match
Adam Walton
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Neel Rajesh
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 1

Form and path

Adam Walton

No recent matches recorded.

Neel Rajesh0–1

CancunHard

LQualifying R3
Nicholas Alexander Reyes
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 4Set 3: 10
Neel Rajesh
Sets won: 1Set 1: 5Set 2: 6Set 3: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Adam Walton vs Neel Rajesh, Champaign 2019, Qualifying R2

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research