Dragos Dima vs Bruno Santanna, La Marsa 2019, Round of 16

ITF M25 · Round of 16 · Hard · Thu 5 Sept

Final

Dragos Dima

LostRank #1499

Santanna won in 2 sets · 1h 29m

0–2

Set 12–6

Set 24–6

Bruno Santanna

WinnerRank #1272

Venue

AS Marsa Tennis Club

La Marsa, TUN· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

23 km/h

Moderate

Humidity

71%

Humid

Temperature

28°C

Warm

Altitude

7 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 29m

1Aces2

1Double faults1

33Service points won40

9Service games played9

6Service games won9

9Return games played9

5/863%Break points saved100%1/1

0/10%Break points converted38%3/8

Head to head

0Dima

1Santanna

1 meeting

La MarsaRound of 16 · 5 Sept 2019HardThis match
Bruno Santanna
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Dragos Dima
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Dragos Dima vs Bruno Santanna, La Marsa 2019, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research