Samuel Brosset vs Loris Pourroy, Uriage 2019, Round of 16

ITF M15 · Round of 16 · Hard · Thu 18 Jul

Final

Samuel Brosset

WinnerRank #1894

Brosset won in 2 sets · 1h 1m

2–0

Set 16–1

Set 26–3

Loris Pourroy

LostRank #1917

Venue

Tennis Club Uriage

Uriage, FRA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

9 km/h

Light

Humidity

49%

Comfortable

Temperature

27°C

Warm

Altitude

413 m

Moderate

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 1m

1Aces1

2Double faults5

29Service points won16

8Service games played8

5Service games won1

8Return games played8

5/863%Break points saved22%2/9

7/978%Break points converted38%3/8

Head to head

1Brosset

0Pourroy

1 meeting

UriageRound of 16 · 18 Jul 2019HardThis match
Samuel Brosset
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Loris Pourroy
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Samuel Brosset vs Loris Pourroy, Uriage 2019, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research