Shane Monroe vs Nick Lagaev, Pittsburgh 2019, Qualifying R1

ITF M15 · Qualifying R1 · Clay · Mon 1 Jul

Final

Shane Monroe

LostUnranked

Lagaev won in 3 sets

1–2

Set 14–6

Set 26–2

Set 35–10

Nick Lagaev

WinnerRank #1929

Venue

Mt. Lebanon Tennis Center

Mt. Lebanon, USA· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

9 km/h

Light

Humidity

70%

Humid

Temperature

28°C

Warm

Altitude

325 m

Moderate

Historical daily weather

Head to head

0Monroe

1Lagaev

1 meeting

PittsburghQualifying R1 · 1 Jul 2019ClayThis match
Nick Lagaev
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 2Set 3: 10
Shane Monroe
Sets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 5

Form and path

Shane Monroe0–1

RochesterClay

LQualifying R1
Anthony Jackie Tang
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
Shane Monroe
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 5

Nick Lagaev

No recent matches recorded.

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Shane Monroe vs Nick Lagaev, Pittsburgh 2019, Qualifying R1

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research