Luis Faria vs Nuno Borges, Setubal 2019, Quarterfinal

ITF M15 · Quarterfinal · Hard · Fri 28 Jun

Final

Luis Faria

LostRank #1857

Borges won in 2 sets · 1h 26m

0–2

Set 13–6

Set 24–6

Nuno Borges

WinnerRank #53

Venue

Clube de Ténis de Setúbal

Setúbal, POR· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

24 km/h

Moderate

Humidity

67%

Moderate

Temperature

30°C

Warm

Altitude

8 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 26m

4Aces5

1Double faults3

38Service points won43

9Service games played10

7Service games won10

10Return games played9

4/667%Break points saved0/0

0/0Break points converted33%2/6

Head to head

0Faria

1Borges

1 meeting

SetubalQuarterfinal · 28 Jun 2019HardThis match
Nuno Borges
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Luis Faria
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Luis Faria vs Nuno Borges, Setubal 2019, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research