Pol Martin Tiffon vs Tom Pisane, Tabarka 2019, Round of 16

ITF M15 · Round of 16 · Clay · Thu 27 Jun

Final

Pol Martin Tiffon

WinnerRank #211

Tiffon won in 2 sets · 1h 10m

2–0

Set 16–3

Set 26–0

Tom Pisane

LostRank #1837

Venue

Magic Hotel Thabraca

Tabarka, TUN· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

15 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

70%

Humid

Temperature

29°C

Warm

Altitude

14 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 10m

2Aces0

3Double faults3

38Service points won18

8Service games played7

8Service games won3

7Return games played8

5/5100%Break points saved33%2/6

4/667%Break points converted0%0/5

Head to head

1Tiffon

0Pisane

1 meeting

TabarkaRound of 16 · 27 Jun 2019ClayThis match
Pol Martin Tiffon
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Tom Pisane
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 0

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Pol Martin Tiffon vs Tom Pisane, Tabarka 2019, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research