Michael Shabaz vs Kyle Seelig, Rochester 2019, Round of 16

ITF M15 · Round of 16 · Clay · Thu 27 Jun

Final

Michael Shabaz

LostRank #1968

Seelig won in 2 sets · 1h 26m

0–2

Set 13–6

Set 22–6

Kyle Seelig

WinnerRank #1912

Venue

Tennis Club of Rochester

Pittsford, USA· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

11 km/h

Light

Humidity

68%

Moderate

Temperature

28°C

Warm

Altitude

141 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 26m

0Aces0

2Double faults0

28Service points won38

9Service games played8

4Service games won7

8Return games played9

4/944%Break points saved75%3/4

1/425%Break points converted56%5/9

Head to head

0Shabaz

1Seelig

1 meeting

RochesterRound of 16 · 27 Jun 2019ClayThis match
Kyle Seelig
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Michael Shabaz
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Michael Shabaz vs Kyle Seelig, Rochester 2019, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research