Denis Yevseyev vs Denis Parshutin, Irpin 2019, Round of 16

ITF M15 · Round of 16 · Clay · Wed 22 May

Final

Denis Yevseyev

WinnerRank #470

Yevseyev won in 2 sets · 1h 10m

2–0

Set 16–4

Set 26–1

Denis Parshutin

LostRank #1816

Venue

Tennis Centre UTF

Irpin, UKR· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

10 km/h

Light

Humidity

81%

Humid

Temperature

23°C

Warm

Altitude

130 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 10m

1Aces0

3Double faults3

34Service points won29

8Service games played9

6Service games won3

9Return games played8

7/978%Break points saved50%6/12

6/1250%Break points converted22%2/9

Head to head

1Yevseyev

0Parshutin

1 meeting

IrpinRound of 16 · 22 May 2019ClayThis match
Denis Yevseyev
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Denis Parshutin
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 1

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Denis Yevseyev vs Denis Parshutin, Irpin 2019, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research