Luca Giacomini vs Jules Okala, Tabarka 2019, Semifinal

ITF M15 · Semifinal · Hard · Sat 18 May

Final

Luca Giacomini

LostRank #1815

Okala won in 2 sets · 1h 3m

0–2

Set 13–6

Set 20–6

Jules Okala

WinnerRank #1885

Venue

Magic Hotel Thabraca

Tabarka, TUN· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

17 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

76%

Humid

Temperature

19°C

Mild

Altitude

14 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 3m

0Aces0

1Double faults1

17Service points won21

8Service games played7

1Service games won5

7Return games played8

2/922%Break points saved0%0/2

2/2100%Break points converted78%7/9

Head to head

0Giacomini

1Okala

1 meeting

TabarkaSemifinal · 18 May 2019HardThis match
Jules Okala
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Luca Giacomini
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 0

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Luca Giacomini vs Jules Okala, Tabarka 2019, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research