Facundo Bagnis vs Zdenek Kolar, Braga Challenger 2019, Semifinal

Challenger · Semifinal · Clay · Sat 11 May

Final

Facundo Bagnis

WinnerRank #1381

Bagnis won in 2 sets · 57m

2–0

Set 16–2

Set 26–0

Zdenek Kolar

LostRank #203

Venue

Clube de Tenis de Braga

Braga, POR· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

9 km/h

Light

Humidity

77%

Humid

Temperature

23°C

Warm

Altitude

178 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Match stats

57m

1Aces0

0Double faults0

28Service points won20

7Service games played7

7Service games won2

7Return games played7

0/0Break points saved38%3/8

5/863%Break points converted0/0

Head to head

1Bagnis

0Kolar

1 meeting

Braga ChallengerSemifinal · 11 May 2019ClayThis match
Facundo Bagnis
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Zdenek Kolar
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 0

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Facundo Bagnis vs Zdenek Kolar, Braga Challenger 2019, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research