Andrea Basso vs Jeroen Vanneste, Rovinj 2019, Semifinal

ITF M15 · Semifinal · Clay · Sat 23 Mar

Final

Andrea Basso

LostRank #931

Vanneste won in 2 sets · 1h 33m

0–2

Set 15–7

Set 22–6

Jeroen Vanneste

WinnerRank #1663

Venue

Teniski centar Eden

Rovinj, CRO· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

15 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

49%

Comfortable

Temperature

20°C

Mild

Altitude

20 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 33m

1Aces2

4Double faults0

40Service points won40

10Service games played10

6Service games won9

10Return games played10

2/633%Break points saved0%0/1

1/1100%Break points converted67%4/6

Head to head

0Basso

1Vanneste

1 meeting

RovinjSemifinal · 23 Mar 2019ClayThis match
Jeroen Vanneste
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Andrea Basso
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Andrea Basso vs Jeroen Vanneste, Rovinj 2019, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research