Loic Perret vs Christian Langmo, Sharm ElSheikh 2019, Qualifying R3

ITF M15 · Qualifying R3 · Hard · Mon 11 Feb

Final

Loic Perret

LostRank #1438

Langmo won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 14–6

Set 25–7

Christian Langmo

WinnerRank #514

Venue

SOHO Racket Center

Sharm ElSheikh, EGY· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

37 km/h

Fresh

Humidity

44%

Comfortable

Temperature

20°C

Mild

Altitude

36 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Head to head

0Perret

1Langmo

1 meeting

Sharm ElSheikhQualifying R3 · 11 Feb 2019HardThis match
Christian Langmo
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
Loic Perret
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 5

Form and path

Loic Perret4–2

MonastirHard

LQuarterfinal
Luca Prevosto
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Loic Perret
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4

Christian Langmo

No recent matches recorded.

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Loic Perret vs Christian Langmo, Sharm ElSheikh 2019, Qualifying R3

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research