Yan Bai vs Li-Wei Tan, Anning 2019, Round of 16

ITF M15 · Round of 16 · Clay · Thu 17 Jan

Final

Yan Bai

WinnerRank #1758

Bai won in 3 sets · 2h 53m

2–1

Set 16–7⁵

Set 26–4

Set 37–5

Li-Wei Tan

LostRank #2028

Venue

Hot Spring Tennis Center Anning

Anning, CHN· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

16 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

73%

Humid

Temperature

15°C

Mild

Altitude

1837 m

Very high

Historical daily weather

Match stats

2h 53m

8Aces5

4Double faults8

67Service points won77

17Service games played17

13Service games won11

17Return games played17

3/743%Break points saved79%22/28

6/2821%Break points converted57%4/7

Head to head

1Bai

0Tan

1 meeting

AnningRound of 16 · 17 Jan 2019ClayThis match
Yan Bai
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6⁵Set 2: 6Set 3: 7
Li-Wei Tan
Sets won: 1Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 4Set 3: 5

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Yan Bai vs Li-Wei Tan, Anning 2019, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research