Wei Qiang Zheng vs Ray Ho, Anning 2019, Round of 16

ITF M15 · Round of 16 · Clay · Thu 17 Jan

Final

Wei Qiang Zheng

LostRank #15982.0346%

Ho won in 2 sets · 1h 50m

0–2

Set 14–6

Set 24–6

Ray Ho

WinnerRank #16581.7554%

Venue

Hot Spring Tennis Center Anning

Anning, CHN· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

16 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

73%

Humid

Temperature

15°C

Mild

Altitude

1837 m

Very high

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 50m

3Aces6

5Double faults2

55Service points won46

10Service games played10

8Service games won10

10Return games played10

11/1385%Break points saved100%4/4

0/40%Break points converted15%2/13

Head to head

0Zheng

1Ho

1 meeting

AnningRound of 16 · 17 Jan 2019ClayThis match
Ray Ho
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Wei Qiang Zheng
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Wei Qiang Zheng vs Ray Ho, Anning 2019, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research