Nikola Cacic vs Mikael Torpegaard, Champaign Challenger 2018, Qualifying R3

Challenger · Qualifying R3 · Hard · Mon 12 Nov

Final

Nikola Cacic

LostRank #15165.0019%

Torpegaard won in 2 sets · 1h 21m

0–2

Set 15–7

Set 25–7

Mikael Torpegaard

WinnerRank #11341.1481%

Venue

Atkins Tennis Center

Urbana, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

231 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Low

Match stats

1h 21m

3Aces8

5Double faults5

51Service points won50

12Service games played12

10Service games won12

12Return games played12

4/667%Break points saved100%1/1

0/10%Break points converted33%2/6

Head to head

0Cacic

1Torpegaard

1 meeting

Champaign ChallengerQualifying R3 · 12 Nov 2018HardThis match
Mikael Torpegaard
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 7
Nikola Cacic
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 5

Form and path

Nikola Cacic0–4

Champaign CHThis week

WQualifying R2
Nikola Cacic
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 2

Barcelona CHClay

LQualifying R1
Jordi Samper Montana
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Nikola Cacic
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 1

Banja Luka CHClay

LQualifying R1
Marko Tepavac
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
Nikola Cacic
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 5

Seville CHHard

LQualifying R1
Ronald Slobodchikov
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7⁷
Nikola Cacic
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 6⁴

Mallorca CHHard

LQualifying R1
Tim Van Rijthoven
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6
Nikola Cacic
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 4

Mikael Torpegaard

No recent matches recorded.

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Nikola Cacic vs Mikael Torpegaard, Champaign Challenger 2018, Qualifying R3

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Form and path

Match research