Ivo Karlovic vs Tommy Paul, Charlottesville Challenger 2018, Quarterfinal

Challenger · Quarterfinal · Hard · Fri 2 Nov

Final

Ivo Karlovic

LostRank #1066

Paul won in 2 sets · 1h 12m

0–2

Set 16–7⁵

Set 24–6

Tommy Paul

WinnerRank #14

Venue

Boar's Head Sports Club

Charlottesville, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Altitude

173 m

Above sea level

Indoor venue, weather not factored

Low

Match stats

1h 12m

17Aces4

6Double faults1

49Service points won49

11Service games played11

10Service games won11

11Return games played11

6/786%Break points saved0/0

0/0Break points converted14%1/7

Head to head

0Karlovic

1Paul

1 meeting

Charlottesville ChallengerQuarterfinal · 2 Nov 2018HardThis match
Tommy Paul
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7⁷Set 2: 6
Ivo Karlovic
Sets won: 0Set 1: 6⁵Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Ivo Karlovic vs Tommy Paul, Charlottesville Challenger 2018, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research