Edan Leshem vs Guy Den Heijer, Herzliya 2018, Round of 16

ITF M15 · Round of 16 · Hard · Wed 10 Oct

Final

Edan Leshem

WinnerRank #1953

Leshem won in 2 sets · 1h 8m

2–0

Set 16–1

Set 26–2

Guy Den Heijer

LostRank #1899

Venue

Ashkelon Tennis Center

Ashkelon, ISR· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

14 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

67%

Moderate

Temperature

28°C

Warm

Altitude

35 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 8m

4Aces2

3Double faults0

36Service points won21

8Service games played7

8Service games won3

7Return games played8

2/2100%Break points saved50%4/8

4/850%Break points converted0%0/2

Head to head

1Leshem

0Heijer

1 meeting

HerzliyaRound of 16 · 10 Oct 2018HardThis match
Edan Leshem
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Guy Den Heijer
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Edan Leshem vs Guy Den Heijer, Herzliya 2018, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research