Ben Patael vs Jeremy Sonkin, Herzliya 2018, Round of 16

ITF M15 · Round of 16 · Hard · Wed 10 Oct

Final

Ben Patael

WinnerRank #1833

Patael won in 2 sets · 1h 30m

2–0

Set 16–0

Set 27–6⁶

Jeremy Sonkin

LostRank #1430

Venue

Ashkelon Tennis Center

Ashkelon, ISR· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

14 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

67%

Moderate

Temperature

28°C

Warm

Altitude

35 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 30m

10Aces0

1Double faults0

37Service points won25

9Service games played9

6Service games won3

9Return games played9

2/540%Break points saved40%4/10

6/1060%Break points converted60%3/5

Head to head

1Patael

0Sonkin

1 meeting

HerzliyaRound of 16 · 10 Oct 2018HardThis match
Ben Patael
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7⁸
Jeremy Sonkin
Sets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 6⁶

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Ben Patael vs Jeremy Sonkin, Herzliya 2018, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research