Tiago Cacao vs Niklas Schell, Setubal 2018, Quarterfinal

ITF M15 · Quarterfinal · Hard · Fri 21 Sept

Final

Tiago Cacao

WinnerRank #631

Cacao won in 2 sets · 1h 30m

2–0

Set 16–3

Set 26–4

Niklas Schell

LostRank #1100

Venue

Sparks Tennis Park Palmela

Palmela, POR· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

23 km/h

Moderate

Humidity

71%

Humid

Temperature

30°C

Warm

Altitude

56 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 30m

2Aces1

0Double faults2

35Service points won34

9Service games played10

7Service games won5

10Return games played9

3/560%Break points saved50%5/10

5/1050%Break points converted40%2/5

Head to head

1Cacao

0Schell

1 meeting

SetubalQuarterfinal · 21 Sept 2018HardThis match
Tiago Cacao
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Niklas Schell
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Tiago Cacao vs Niklas Schell, Setubal 2018, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research