Jim Walder vs Emmanuel Luria, Antalya 2018, Round of 16

ITF M15 · Round of 16 · Clay · Thu 20 Sept

Final

Jim Walder

WinnerRank #18621.1881%

Walder won in 2 sets · 1h 6m

2–0

Set 16–2

Set 26–0

Emmanuel Luria

LostRank #19375.0019%

Venue

Hotel Kaya Belek

Belek, TUR· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

14 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

48%

Comfortable

Temperature

35°C

Hot

Altitude

8 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 6m

1Aces1

1Double faults3

29Service points won14

7Service games played7

7Service games won2

7Return games played7

1/1100%Break points saved29%2/7

5/771%Break points converted0%0/1

Head to head

1Walder

0Luria

1 meeting

AntalyaRound of 16 · 20 Sept 2018ClayThis match
Jim Walder
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Emmanuel Luria
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 0

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Jim Walder vs Emmanuel Luria, Antalya 2018, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research