Lloyd Glasspool vs Liam Draxl, Niagara 2018, Quarterfinal

ITF M25 · Quarterfinal · Hard · Thu 13 Sept

Final

Lloyd Glasspool

WinnerRank #1195

Glasspool won in 2 sets · 1h 33m

2–0

Set 16–2

Set 27–5

Liam Draxl

LostRank #197

Venue

Sobeys Stadium

Toronto, CAN· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

16 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

82%

Humid

Temperature

25°C

Warm

Altitude

193 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 33m

6Aces1

7Double faults2

41Service points won36

10Service games played10

8Service games won5

10Return games played10

2/450%Break points saved55%6/11

5/1145%Break points converted50%2/4

Head to head

1Glasspool

0Draxl

1 meeting

NiagaraQuarterfinal · 13 Sept 2018HardThis match
Lloyd Glasspool
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
Liam Draxl
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 5

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Lloyd Glasspool vs Liam Draxl, Niagara 2018, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research