Mitchell Stewart vs Amit Batta, Claremont 2018, Qualifying R1

ITF M15 · Qualifying R1 · Hard · Fri 7 Sept

Final · Retired

Mitchell Stewart

WinnerRank #1648

Stewart won · Retired

1–0

Set 16–0

Set 21–0

Amit Batta

LostUnranked

Venue

Claremont Club

Claremont, USA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

14 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

55%

Moderate

Temperature

35°C

Hot

Altitude

437 m

Moderate

Historical daily weather

Head to head

1Stewart

0Batta

1 meeting

ClaremontQualifying R1 · 7 Sept 2018HardThis match
Mitchell Stewart
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 1
Amit Batta
Sets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 0
Amit Batta · Retired

Form and path

Mitchell Stewart

No recent matches recorded.

Amit Batta0–1

NeuchatelClay

LRound of 32
Alexandar Lazov
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Amit Batta
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Mitchell Stewart vs Amit Batta, Claremont 2018, Qualifying R1

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research