Nik Razborsek vs Sandro Kopp, Haren 2018, Round of 16

ITF M15 · Round of 16 · Clay · Thu 30 Aug

Final

Nik Razborsek

WinnerRank #15091.0393%

Razborsek won in 2 sets · 1h 4m

2–0

Set 16–1

Set 26–1

Sandro Kopp

LostRank #30813.507%

Venue

Tennis- en Squashclub Haren

Haren, NED· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

22 km/h

Moderate

Humidity

79%

Humid

Temperature

18°C

Mild

Altitude

10 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 4m

2Aces0

1Double faults1

29Service points won13

7Service games played7

7Service games won2

7Return games played7

0/0Break points saved17%1/6

5/683%Break points converted0/0

Head to head

1Razborsek

0Kopp

1 meeting

HarenRound of 16 · 30 Aug 2018ClayThis match
Nik Razborsek
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Sandro Kopp
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 1

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Nik Razborsek vs Sandro Kopp, Haren 2018, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research