Edoardo Lavagno vs Emilien Burnel, Chitila 2018, Qualifying R1

ITF M15 · Qualifying R1 · Clay · Sat 25 Aug

Final

Edoardo Lavagno

WinnerRank #1936

Lavagno won in 2 sets

2–0

Set 16–3

Set 26–3

Emilien Burnel

LostRank #1771

Venue

Club Sportiv Chitila

Chitila, ROU· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

12 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

57%

Moderate

Temperature

30°C

Warm

Altitude

98 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Head to head

1Lavagno

0Burnel

1 meeting

ChitilaQualifying R1 · 25 Aug 2018ClayThis match
Edoardo Lavagno
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Emilien Burnel
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3

Form and path

Edoardo Lavagno

No recent matches recorded.

Emilien Burnel0–1

Curtea de ArgesClay

LQualifying R1
Stefan Adrian Andreescu
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
Emilien Burnel
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 5

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Edoardo Lavagno vs Emilien Burnel, Chitila 2018, Qualifying R1

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research