Marek Gengel vs Igor Smilansky, Minsk 2018, Semifinal

ITF M15 · Semifinal · Hard · Fri 24 Aug

Final

Marek Gengel

WinnerRank #419

Gengel won in 2 sets · 1h 13m

2–0

Set 16–4

Set 26–4

Igor Smilansky

LostRank #1494

Venue

Republic Olympic Tennis Centre, Pobeditelei63

Minsk, BLR· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

217 m

Low

Match stats

1h 13m

3Aces4

0Double faults2

38Service points won41

10Service games played10

9Service games won7

10Return games played10

2/367%Break points saved63%5/8

3/838%Break points converted33%1/3

Head to head

1Gengel

0Smilansky

1 meeting

MinskSemifinal · 24 Aug 2018HardThis match
Marek Gengel
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Igor Smilansky
Sets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Marek Gengel vs Igor Smilansky, Minsk 2018, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research