Matvey Minin vs Denis Klok, Riga 2018, Quarterfinal

ITF M15 · Quarterfinal · Clay · Thu 2 Aug

Final

Matvey Minin

LostRank #1936

Klok won in 2 sets · 1h 32m

0–2

Set 13–6

Set 23–6

Denis Klok

WinnerRank #852

Venue

SMScredit.lv Tenisa centrs, now Rimi tennis center

Riga, LAT· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

14 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

60%

Moderate

Temperature

29°C

Warm

Altitude

11 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 32m

1Aces0

1Double faults0

24Service points won33

9Service games played9

3Service games won6

9Return games played9

4/1040%Break points saved50%3/6

3/650%Break points converted60%6/10

Head to head

0Minin

1Klok

1 meeting

RigaQuarterfinal · 2 Aug 2018ClayThis match
Denis Klok
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Matvey Minin
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Matvey Minin vs Denis Klok, Riga 2018, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research