Luke Saville vs Thomas Fancutt, Lexington 2018, Qualifying R1
Final score
Final
4-6 6-1 7-5
Venue and conditions
Hilary J. Boone Tennis CenterLexington, USA
Outdoor hardCourt speed1.5 vs last year99.6Average
What is court speed?
How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.
- Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
- Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
- Average97–103US Open, Dubai
- Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
- Very fast108+Basel
Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.
How court speed worksConditionsHistorical daily weather
Match stats
1h 56m6Aces10
8Double faults1
46Service points won57
14Service games played15
9Service games won12
15Return games played14
3/838%Break points saved50%3/6
3/650%Break points converted63%5/8
Head to head
3Saville
2Fancutt
5 meetingsHard 3–1Grass 0–1
- LexingtonQualifying R1 · 28 Jul 2018HardThis matchThomas FancuttSets won: 2Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 7Luke SavilleSets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 1Set 3: 5
- CaloundraSemifinal · 29 Jul 2023HardLuke SavilleSets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 6Thomas FancuttSets won: 0Set 1: 61Set 2: 4
- Swan HillFinal · 5 Mar 2023GrassThomas FancuttSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 63Set 3: 7Luke SavilleSets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 7Set 3: 5
- Adelaide 2Qualifying R1 · 9 Jan 2022HardLuke SavilleSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Thomas FancuttSets won: 0Set 1: 4Set 2: 4
- BrisbaneSemifinal · 5 Oct 2019HardLuke SavilleSets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6Thomas FancuttSets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4
Match research
ProEverything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.
- Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
- Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
- Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
- Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.