Wilson Leite vs Hugo Largo, Porto 2018, Round of 16

ITF M25 · Round of 16 · Hard · Thu 26 Jul

Final

Wilson Leite

WinnerRank #6951.0988%

Leite won in 2 sets · 1h 23m

2–0

Set 16–2

Set 26–2

Hugo Largo

LostRank #17277.7012%

Venue

Complexo Desportivo do Monte Aventino

Porto, POR· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

16 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

88%

Very humid

Temperature

21°C

Mild

Altitude

149 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 23m

0Aces0

2Double faults3

35Service points won24

8Service games played8

7Service games won3

8Return games played8

3/475%Break points saved44%4/9

5/956%Break points converted25%1/4

Head to head

1Leite

0Largo

1 meeting

PortoRound of 16 · 26 Jul 2018HardThis match
Wilson Leite
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Hugo Largo
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 2

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Wilson Leite vs Hugo Largo, Porto 2018, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research