Bjorn Hoffmann vs Kai Breitbach, Kamen 2018, Qualifying R1

ITF M15 · Qualifying R1 · Clay · Sun 24 Jun

Final

Bjorn Hoffmann

LostRank #1659

Breitbach won in 2 sets

0–2

Set 15–7

Set 26–7⁴

Kai Breitbach

WinnerRank #1384

Venue

VfL Tennis Kamen

Kamen, GER· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

14 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

75%

Humid

Temperature

16°C

Mild

Altitude

61 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Head to head

0Hoffmann

1Breitbach

1 meeting

KamenQualifying R1 · 24 Jun 2018ClayThis match
Kai Breitbach
Sets won: 2Set 1: 7Set 2: 7⁷
Bjorn Hoffmann
Sets won: 0Set 1: 5Set 2: 6⁴

Form and path

Bjorn Hoffmann2–3

Los AngelesHard

San Francisco CHHard

LQualifying R1
Christian Harrison
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Bjorn Hoffmann
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 2

BerkeleyHard

Kai Breitbach

No recent matches recorded.

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Bjorn Hoffmann vs Kai Breitbach, Kamen 2018, Qualifying R1

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Form and path

Match research