Ivan Nedelko vs Goran Markovic, Kampala 2018, Semifinal

ITF M15 · Semifinal · Hard · Fri 25 May

Final · Retired

Ivan Nedelko

WinnerRank #992

Nedelko won · Retired · 1h 6m

1–0

Set 16–2

Set 25–3

Goran Markovic

LostRank #2004

Venue

Lugogo Tennis Club

Kampala, UGA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

1153 m

High

Match stats

1h 6m

0Aces0

0Double faults4

32Service points won27

8Service games played8

7Service games won4

8Return games played8

0/10%Break points saved33%2/6

4/667%Break points converted100%1/1

Head to head

1Nedelko

0Markovic

1 meeting

KampalaSemifinal · 25 May 2018HardThis match
Ivan Nedelko
Sets won: 1Set 1: 6Set 2: 5
Goran Markovic
Sets won: 0Set 1: 2Set 2: 3
Goran Markovic · Retired

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Ivan Nedelko vs Goran Markovic, Kampala 2018, Semifinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research