Kunal Anand vs Tyler Lu, Kampala 2018, Quarterfinal

ITF M15 · Quarterfinal · Hard · Thu 24 May

Final

Kunal Anand

LostRank #1612

Lu won in 3 sets · 3h 5m

1–2

Set 14–6

Set 27–6⁰

Set 35–7

Tyler Lu

WinnerRank #1510

Venue

Lugogo Tennis Club

Kampala, UGA· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

12 km/h

Light

Humidity

89%

Very humid

Temperature

24°C

Warm

Altitude

1153 m

High

Historical daily weather

Match stats

3h 5m

1Aces3

10Double faults6

81Service points won74

17Service games played17

13Service games won15

17Return games played17

20/2483%Break points saved78%7/9

2/922%Break points converted17%4/24

Head to head

0Anand

1Lu

1 meeting

KampalaQuarterfinal · 24 May 2018HardThis match
Tyler Lu
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6⁰Set 3: 7
Kunal Anand
Sets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 7⁷Set 3: 5

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Kunal Anand vs Tyler Lu, Kampala 2018, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research