Jonas Merckx vs Dmitry Myagkov, Rivne 2018, Round of 16

ITF M15 · Round of 16 · Clay · Wed 23 May

Final

Jonas Merckx

WinnerRank #1434

Merckx won in 2 sets · 1h 4m

2–0

Set 16–1

Set 26–3

Dmitry Myagkov

LostRank #1751

Venue

Sofia / Sofia Star tennis complex

Rivne, UKR· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

12 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

61%

Moderate

Temperature

25°C

Warm

Altitude

231 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 4m

2Aces0

6Double faults1

27Service points won18

8Service games played8

6Service games won2

8Return games played8

0/20%Break points saved14%1/7

6/786%Break points converted100%2/2

Head to head

1Merckx

0Myagkov

1 meeting

RivneRound of 16 · 23 May 2018ClayThis match
Jonas Merckx
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Dmitry Myagkov
Sets won: 0Set 1: 1Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Jonas Merckx vs Dmitry Myagkov, Rivne 2018, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research