Lukas Rosol vs Franco Ribero, Xàbia 2018, Round of 16

ITF M25 · Round of 16 · Clay · Wed 21 Mar

Final

Lukas Rosol

WinnerRank #17771.0194%

Rosol won in 2 sets · 1h 5m

2–0

Set 16–0

Set 26–0

Franco Ribero

LostRank #68517.006%

Venue

Club Tennis Reus Monterols

Reus, ESP· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

27 km/h

Moderate

Humidity

33%

Comfortable

Temperature

14°C

Mild

Altitude

107 m

Low

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 5m

1Aces0

0Double faults3

38Service points won8

6Service games played6

6Service games won0

6Return games played6

4/4100%Break points saved40%4/10

6/1060%Break points converted0%0/4

Head to head

1Rosol

0Ribero

1 meeting

XàbiaRound of 16 · 21 Mar 2018ClayThis match
Lukas Rosol
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Franco Ribero
Sets won: 0Set 1: 0Set 2: 0

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Lukas Rosol vs Franco Ribero, Xàbia 2018, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research