Bruno Santanna vs David Perez Sanz, Poreč 2018, Round of 16

ITF M15 · Round of 16 · Clay · Thu 15 Mar

Final

Bruno Santanna

LostRank #12721.4466%

Sanz won in 2 sets · 1h 18m

0–2

Set 13–6

Set 23–6

David Perez Sanz

WinnerRank #14912.8334%Upset

Venue

Tennis Center Pical

Poreč, CRO· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

—

No reading

Humidity

—

No reading

Temperature

—

No reading

Altitude

6 m

Sea level

Match stats

1h 18m

0Aces4

4Double faults1

26Service points won36

9Service games played9

4Service games won7

9Return games played9

1/617%Break points saved50%2/4

2/450%Break points converted83%5/6

Head to head

0Santanna

1Sanz

1 meeting

PorečRound of 16 · 15 Mar 2018ClayThis match
David Perez Sanz
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Bruno Santanna
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Bruno Santanna vs David Perez Sanz, Poreč 2018, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research