Jan Mertl vs Florian Fallert, Doha 2018, Round of 16

ITF M15 · Round of 16 · Hard · Wed 14 Mar

Final

Jan Mertl

WinnerRank #1844

Mertl won in 2 sets · 1h 13m

2–0

Set 16–3

Set 26–1

Florian Fallert

LostRank #1606

Venue

Khalifa International Tennis and Squash Complex

Doha, QAT· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

32 km/h

Fresh

Humidity

29%

Dry

Temperature

31°C

Warm

Altitude

10 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 13m

6Aces0

1Double faults0

38Service points won25

8Service games played8

8Service games won4

8Return games played8

2/2100%Break points saved20%1/5

4/580%Break points converted0%0/2

Head to head

1Mertl

0Fallert

1 meeting

DohaRound of 16 · 14 Mar 2018HardThis match
Jan Mertl
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Florian Fallert
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 1

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Jan Mertl vs Florian Fallert, Doha 2018, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research