Gonzalo Escobar vs Dragos Dima, Rovinj 2018, Quarterfinal

ITF M15 · Quarterfinal · Clay · Sat 10 Mar

Final

Gonzalo Escobar

WinnerRank #1369

Escobar won in 2 sets · 1h 35m

2–0

Set 16–3

Set 26–3

Dragos Dima

LostRank #1499

Venue

Teniski centar Eden

Rovinj, CRO· Clay

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

12 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

85%

Very humid

Temperature

13°C

Mild

Altitude

16 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 35m

1Aces1

2Double faults3

33Service points won25

9Service games played9

6Service games won3

9Return games played9

3/650%Break points saved45%5/11

6/1155%Break points converted50%3/6

Head to head

1Escobar

0Dima

1 meeting

RovinjQuarterfinal · 10 Mar 2018ClayThis match
Gonzalo Escobar
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Dragos Dima
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 3

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Gonzalo Escobar vs Dragos Dima, Rovinj 2018, Quarterfinal

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research