Daniel Gimeno Traver vs Miljan Zekic, Peguera 2018, Final

ITF M15 · Final · Hard · Sun 18 Feb

Final

Daniel Gimeno Traver

LostRank #12221.6359%

Zekic won in 3 sets

1–2

Set 14–6

Set 26–3

Set 33–6

Miljan Zekic

WinnerRank #14462.3641%Upset

Venue

Real Murcia Club de Tenis 1919

Murcia, ESP· Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

13 km/h

Gentle

Humidity

83%

Humid

Temperature

14°C

Mild

Altitude

40 m

Sea level

Historical daily weather

Head to head

1Traver

1Zekic

2 meetings

Hard 0–1Clay 1–0

PegueraFinal · 18 Feb 2018HardThis match
Miljan Zekic
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 3Set 3: 6
Daniel Gimeno Traver
Sets won: 1Set 1: 4Set 2: 6Set 3: 3
Santa Margherita di PulaQuarterfinal · 19 Oct 2017Clay
Daniel Gimeno Traver
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 6
Miljan Zekic
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 4

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Daniel Gimeno Traver vs Miljan Zekic, Peguera 2018, Final

Final score

Venue and conditions

Head to head

Match research