Scott Griekspoor vs Yshai Oliel, Tiberias 2017, Round of 16

FUTURES · Round of 16 · Hard · Fri 8 Dec

Final

Scott Griekspoor

WinnerRank #1195

Griekspoor won in 2 sets · 1h 26m

2–0

Set 16–3

Set 27–5

Yshai Oliel

LostRank #1430

Venue

Venue not available

Hard

Court speed

What is court speed?

How much the court helps the server, judged from aces and serve points won and adjusted for who played. 100 is the average ATP tournament court that season.

Very slow< 92Monte Carlo, Rome
Slow92–97Roland Garros, Indian Wells
Average97–103US Open, Dubai
Fast103–108Wimbledon, Shanghai
Very fast108+Basel

Challenger and ITF courts usually read lower: partly the venues, partly the balls and conditions at those levels.

How court speed works

Know how fast this court plays before the first serve

See it with Pro

Wind

7 km/h

Light

Humidity

62%

Moderate

Temperature

18°C

Mild

Altitude

—

No reading

Historical daily weather

Match stats

1h 26m

8Aces4

2Double faults0

47Service points won36

10Service games played11

10Service games won8

11Return games played10

2/2100%Break points saved0%0/3

3/3100%Break points converted0%0/2

Head to head

1Griekspoor

0Oliel

1 meeting

TiberiasRound of 16 · 8 Dec 2017HardThis match
Scott Griekspoor
Sets won: 2Set 1: 6Set 2: 7
Yshai Oliel
Sets won: 0Set 1: 3Set 2: 5

Match research

Pro

Everything that shapes this match: each player’s run-in and travel, records side by side, and results against similar opponents and in similar conditions. Better information, better-informed decisions.

Run-inEvery match in the last 28 days, rest days and travel between venues.
Tale of the tapeRecords and serve numbers side by side, filtered by period and surface.
Record by opponent rankingHow each player does against the top 10, top 50 or any ranking range.
Similar conditionsResults in comparable heat, humidity, wind and altitude before scheduled matches.

Get the edge with Pro

Scott Griekspoor vs Yshai Oliel, Tiberias 2017, Round of 16

Final score

Venue and conditions

Match stats

Head to head

Match research